INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872
BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
19. Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit.
17. Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit.
changed or removed in old law
changed or added in new law
Similar wording stays plain; only differences are highlighted.
INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872
19. Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit. ––Statements
made by persons whose position or liability, it is necessary to prove as against any party to the suit, are
admissions, if such statements would be relevant as against such persons in relation to such position or
liability in a suit brought by or against them, and if they are made whilst the person making them
occupies such position or is subject to such liability.
Illustration
A undertakes to collect rents for B.
B sues A for not collecting rent due from C to B.
A denies that rent was due from C to B.
A statement by C that he owed B rent is an admission, and is a relevant fact as against A, if A denies that C did
owe rent to B.
Repealed / replaced by BSA India Code — IEA 1872
BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
17. Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit.—Statements
made by persons whose position or liability, it is necessary to prove as against any party to the suit, are
admissions, if such statements would be relevant as against such persons in relation to such position or
liability in a suit brought by or against them, and if they are made whilst the person making them
occupies such position or is subject to such liability.
Illustration.
A undertakes to collect rents for B. B sues A for not collecting rent due from C to B. A denies that
rent was due from C to B. A statement by C that he owed B rent is an admission, and is a relevant fact as
against A, if A denies that C did owe rent to B.
Current law India Code — BSA 2023