CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023
292. Evidence of officers of the Mint
328. Evidence of officers of Mint
changed or removed in old law
changed or added in new law
Similar wording stays plain; only differences are highlighted.
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
292. Evidence of officers of the Mint.—(1) Any document purporting to be a report under the hand of any
such 2[officer of any Mint or of any Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press (including the officer of
the Controller of Stamps and Stationery) or of any Forensic Department or Division of Forensic Science Laboratory
or any Government Examiner of Questioned Documents or any State Examiner of Questioned Documents, as the
case may be,] as the Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf, upon any matter or thing duly
submitted to him for examination and report in the course of any proceeding under this Code, may be used as
evidence in any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code, although such officer is not called as a witness.
(2) The Court may, if it thinks fit, summon and examine any such officer as to the subject-matter of his report:
Provided that no such officer shall be summoned to produce any records on which the report is based.
(3) Without prejudice to the provisions of sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), no
such officer shall, 2[except with the permission of the General Manager or any officer in charge of any Mint or of any
Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press or of any Forensic Department or any officer in charge of the
Forensic Science Laboratory or of the Government Examiner of Questioned Documents Organisation or of the State
Examiner of Questioned Documents Organisation, as the case may be,] be permitted—
(a) to give any evidence derived from any unpublished official records on which the report is based; or
(b) to disclose the nature or particulars of any test applied by him in the course of the examination of the
matter or thing.
Legacy / repealed by BNSS India Code — CrPC 1973
BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023
328. Evidence of officers of Mint.—(1) Any document purporting to be a report under the hand of a
gazetted officer of any Mint or of any Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press (including the
officer of the Controller of Stamps and Stationery) or of any Forensic Department or Division of Forensic
Science Laboratory or any Government Examiner of Questioned Documents or any State Examiner of
Questioned Documents as the Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf, upon any
matter or thing duly submitted to him for examination and report in the course of any proceeding under this
Sanhita, may be used as evidence in any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Sanhita, although such
officer is not called as a witness.
(2) The Court may, if it thinks fit, summon and examine any such officer as to the subject-matter of his
report:
Provided that no such officer shall be summoned to produce any records on which the report is based.
(3) Without prejudice to the provisions of sections 129 and 130 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam,
2023, no such officer shall, except with the permission of the General Manager or any officer in charge of
any Mint or of any Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press or of any Forensic Department or
any officer in charge of the Forensic Science Laboratory or of the Government Examiner of Questioned
Documents Organisation or of the State Examiner of Questioned Documents Organisation be permitted—
(a) to give any evidence derived from any unpublished official records on which the report is based;
or
(b) to disclose the nature or particulars of any test applied by him in the course of the examination
of the matter or thing.
Current law India Code — BNSS 2023